![]() ME/CFS South Australia Inc supports the needs of sufferers of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and related illnesses. We do this by providing services and information to members. Disclaimer ME/CFS South Australia Inc aims to keep members informed of various research projects, diets, medications, therapies, news items, etc. All communication, both verbal and written, is merely to disseminate information and not to make recommendations or directives. Unless otherwise stated, the views expressed on this Web site are not necessarily the official views of the Society or its Committee and are not simply an endorsement of products or services. |
|
|||||||||||
Bad Conspiracy Theories: The Bad, The Worse And The UgliestTuesday 2 June 2020
Bad conspiracy theories: The bad, the worse and the ugliest A recent BBC report (https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-52731624) graphically describes the consequences of unchecked propagation of mis- and disinformation about SARS-Cov-2: The hospitalized couple, one near death, in Florida, believing it was a hoax; violence against Muslims in India; people swallowing fish tank cleaner, disinfectants, or toxic alcohol; and the worst and most common — those waiting too long to seek help because they thought the hazards were “overblown” (https://www.erinbromage.com/post/the-risks-know-them-avoid-them). Conspiracy theories are more than just distracting. Deciding who to trust isn’t easy, but it’s possible — and essential. Ask who’s talking. What’s their background, their reputation? Are they writing for a known outlet? Is the piece sensationalist? Contradictory? Do reporters interview multiple people — actual experts — vet sources, fact-check, question inconsistencies (The Conspiracy Theory Handbook; Yahoo News, 05/22/20; Forbes, 05/08/20; Atlantic, 03/21/20; Lifehacker, 05/08/20)? The most recent, and arguably worst, is the slick “documentary”, “Plandemic,” which looks and feels credible but doesn’t hold up under careful scrutiny. It’s been fact-checked by several experts (Science, 05/08/20; factcheck.org, 05/08/20; https://respectfulinsolence.com/2020/05/06/judy-mikovits-pandemic/; NPR;05/08/20). Too much is just — off. Its sole interviewee, Judy Mikovits, is introduced as “one of the most accomplished scientists of her generation.” So who is she? She earned a BS in chemistry in 1980, worked as a lab technician until 1988, got her PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology in 1991, then apparently held postdoctoral positions until 2006, when she was tapped to head a new private institute founded by the Whittemore family to look for a viral cause of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). First red flag — she was apparently a lab tech or a postdoc for more than 20 years, all that time working on other investigators’ projects under their supervision. She was never an independent researcher (respectfulinsolence.com., 05/06/20). Her inexperience caught up with her. An article in the prestigious journal Science, in which she claimed to have discovered a CFS-related virus, was retracted because blood samples were contaminated (Science, 12/23/11). She lost her job and was ultimately arrested (NOT by SWAT) for stealing lab notebooks and other data. Those charges were eventually dropped although the institute won a civil suit. She makes vague claims that Anthony Fauci blocked publication of some work she did as a technician (implausible); that her research on HIV was instrumental in developing treatments (unverified); and that Fauci and “Big Pharma” destroyed her career, without explaining how.
blog comments powered by Disqus |
||||||||||||
|
Registered Charity 3104
Email:
sacfs@sacfs.asn.au
Mailing address:
PO Box 322,
Modbury North,
South Australia 5092
Phone:
1300 128 339
Office Hours:
Monday - Friday,
10am - 4pm
(phone)