ME/CFS South Australia Inc supports the needs of sufferers of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and related illnesses. We do this by providing services and information to members.
ME/CFS South Australia Inc aims to keep members informed of various research projects, diets, medications, therapies, news items, etc. All communication, both verbal and written, is merely to disseminate information and not to make recommendations or directives.
Unless otherwise stated, the views expressed on this Web site are not necessarily the official views of the Society or its Committee and are not simply an endorsement of products or services.
Protesters have got it all wrong on ME
Saturday 3 September 2011
It might seem strange that a group of doctors would be subjected to harassment, bullying and death threats for attempting to help people. Even more baffling if the death threats should come from the very people they were trying to help.
Yet earlier this month, Professor Simon Wessely, a doctor and pioneering researcher into ME (myalgic encephalomyelitis), disclosed that he and other scientists working on the condition had received death threats from a small group of protesters who have ME. [See article and response] In addition, the protesters have made complaints to the General Medical Council, universities and ethics committees – all of which have been proved to be baseless – in an attempt to disrupt further work.
The reason for their behaviour is that research is focusing on the psychological basis of the condition; as a result of the findings, ME is now considered to have a significant psychiatric component. While the protesters represent only a tiny fraction of those with ME, it is true to say that many others feel strongly about the suggestion that it has any basis in psychology at all.
Symptoms of ME include extreme fatigue and muscle pain. Sufferers are sometimes bed-bound or have to use wheelchairs. Many believe that their condition is the result of a viral infection or exposure to environmental toxins. Research to date has failed to support conclusively this hypothesis, much to the chagrin of sufferers, who feel frustrated and angry that doctors remain sceptical that this is the actual cause of the illness.
The ME Association, while condemning the death threats, said that sufferers have a justifiable complaint, as almost no ongoing government-funded research is looking into the biomedical basis of the disease. Yet research is being carried out into the viral aspect, with the Medical Research Council backing a recent study into precisely this.
In addition, years of research have already been undertaken, which has produced underwhelming, inconclusive results to support a solely biomedical cause. It wasn’t until psychiatrists such as Prof Wessely started treating the condition psychologically that real progress was made.
The current gold standard for treatment, as supported by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (Nice), is a combination of supervised exercise and talking therapies. A major British trial published in The Lancet found that at least one in three patients with ME improved or recovered using this approach. The biggest hurdle faced by doctors is persuading people to actually attend and engage with treatment. They resist because they refuse to be seen as mentally unwell. It does seem bizarre that those with such a debilitating disease would refuse treatment because it was given by a psychiatrist.
Most people are more than happy to be seen by a specialist – more than one if required. If you have a painful knee, for example, you might be seen by a rheumatologist and an orthopaedic surgeon. The involvement of representatives of both these specialities would never be regarded as evidence that you were not believed, or that your welfare was being undermined.
Microbiologists and immunologists have been unable to help ME patients, and so psychiatrists have become involved. But that is considered outrageous. People refuse to go to outpatient appointments and refuse treatment, despite evidence that it works. Accusations are thrown around that the medical profession is not taking them seriously. But, just because doctors frame a condition in terms the sufferer does not like, does not mean they are not taking it seriously. That people feel threatened by the idea that ME has a psychological component says a lot about the stigma of mental illness.
It’s an attitude that dogs the lives of many people living with mental health problems. Yet, for me, a psychological explanation is a very real one. It doesn’t mean someone is faking it; it doesn’t mean the illness doesn’t exist. It also doesn’t mean that people should be able simply to pull their socks up and get better, or that it’s under conscious control. However, it is testament to the complexity of the brain that the mind is capable of such stark physical symptoms. As a model for understanding a condition, it’s as valid as any other.
The above, with comments, originally appeared here.
Dr John H Greensmith has published a response to the article:
For some balance to Professor Simon Wessely's views, Dr Max Pemberton (Protesters have got it all wrong on ME, Daily Telegraph, 29 August 2011) might enquire and report in a follow up article, whether there are any psychiatrists who do not think that M.E. (and I mean Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, not Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) is a mental illness that should be treated by them – and who would be prepared to say so publicly, without feeling they were rocking the profession's boat too much?
It would be instructive to discover how many people with M.E. (separated out of the CFS bundle of illnesses) have been referred to psychiatrists and returned to the care of their GPs with a note saying this was not a case for their speciality, without having had any treatment at all and also, of those who did have the treatments that Professor Wessely recommends, what percentage have not recovered at all, or were worse after it.
Will Max investigate some other views, or just settle for Professor Wessely's say-so?
Dr John H Greensmith
The response appeared via email.
blog comments powered by Disqus